Does Elon Musk Actually Want To Buy OpenAI?
Probably not. But that doesn't mean he won't benefit from making the offer.
Late on Thursday, I emailed Elon Musk’s lawyer and suggested Musk had no real interest in buying OpenAI. Musk had made a $97 billion offer for the non-profit earlier in the week, sending the entire AI industry — and those of us following it — for a bit of a loop. It could be legit, but seemed more like a disruptive maneuver, and I wanted to ask Musk’s representation directly.
So I shared my theory with the lawyer, Marc Toberoff, and four minutes later he wrote back with a three word reply: “That's completely wrong.”
Musk and his legal team’s insistence that the offer is real should keep it in the headlines for a while, but I’m still skeptical of their story. While declaring the bid is serious, Musk said this week he’ll abandon it if OpenAI drops its plan to convert from a non-profit to a for-profit. He also has ongoing litigation to prevent OpenAI from becoming a for-profit altogether. And he’s said he intends to restore OpenAI to its open source roots, a tough path if you want to reward the investors backing it with billions.
For Musk, the takeover offer would likely be more useful as a nuisance to OpenAI — and it’s worth reading future coverage of it through that lens. As others have noted, the $97 billion offer will almost certainly raise the compensation that OpenAI will have to pay the non-profit entity as it spins off, and it’s a sum potentially large enough to make the spin off impossible.
The longer the delay, the better it is for Musk’s xAI and its fellow OpenAI competitors, given that OpenAI needs to raise billions of dollars to keep scaling large language models, and perhaps stay in business. That’s naturally much harder to do as long as OpenAI remains a non-profit.
Beyond impeding OpenAI’s for-profit conversion, Musk’s offer is throwing OpenAI off a rhythm it’s worked hard to reestablish since it fired and rehired CEO Sam Altman in fall 2023. At the Paris AI Summit this week, Altman was bombarded with questions about Musk, not his company’s technology, and he didn’t handle the attention well. He was drawn into the muck, responding to Musk by saying "Probably his whole life is from a position of insecurity. I feel for the guy.”
Visibly frustrated, Altman said he believed Musk was simply trying to hamper OpenAI’s progress. “I think he’s probably just trying to slow us down. He obviously is a competitor.”
The comments put Altman in a war of words with Musk and his associates, including Ari Emanuel, the fiery Endeavor CEO. “Sam said that Elon was ‘unhappy as a person.’ Yeah, thank you for your analysis!” Emanuel said at a live Freakonomics podcast event on Thursday. “Elon is unhappy because you’re phony and trying to get away with cheating the charity and its original mission. Elon is not.”
Meanwhile, much of the back and forth between the two parties is taking place through filings with U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, another indication that this was mostly an attempt by Musk to block OpenAI’s for-profit move. The court is currently overseeing Musk’s challenge to OpenAI’s reshuffling, and the filings are showing up in that case’s docket.
In bringing his takeover offer to OpenAI, Musk might’ve harmed his larger case against OpenAI’s corporate transition though. As OpenAI’s lawyers pointed out, Musk argued that OpenAI’s assets cannot be sold for private gain, but he’s now attempting to “have OpenAI, Inc. transfer all of its assets to him, for his economic benefit and that of his competing AI business and hand-picked private investors.” Shortly after OpenAI filed those comments, Musk’s lawyers said he’d give up the bid if OpenAI remained a non-profit.
For Musk, it all might be worth it. After putting millions into OpenAI’s founding, he seems content to use all legal methods available to keep the structure he and Altman initially agreed to — and to harm OpenAI’s current operations — even if he’ll likely never see the takeover through. OpenAI’s non-traditional governance has shaken the organization before, and Musk is using it to rattle the organization again. It’s a living nightmare OpenAI is unlikely to shed anytime soon.
Ship Software Faster with Experienced Engineers (sponsor)
Finding skilled developers is hard—even for seasoned engineering leaders.
Traditional hiring cycles can take months while critical features sit in the backlog.
Lemon.io removes the guesswork by rigorously vetting engineers and matching you with top talent in just 48 hours.
Need to scale your team quickly or find specialized talent that's hard to source locally?
We match you with developers from Europe and Latin America who integrate seamlessly into your workflow—without the long hiring cycles or commitment of long-term contracts.
Unlike other platforms, we don't just check résumés—we put developers through a rigorous multi-step vetting process that assesses technical skills, problem-solving abilities, and communication.
Start building faster with lemon.io
Advertise with Big Technology?
Reach 150,000+ plugged-in tech readers with your company’s latest campaign, product, or thought leadership. To learn more, write alex@bigtechnology.com or reply to this email.
What Else I’m Reading, Etc.
Apple Intelligence is coming to China, with pretty intense censorship [Bloomberg]
TikTok returns to the app store [Bloomberg]
Blue Origin laid off 10% of its employees [Reuters]
Publishers sue AI company Cohere for copyright violations [WSJ]
A new low-cost iPhone SE is likely coming next week [The Verge]
Getaround shuts down U.S. operations [TechCrunch]
Takeaway from this week’s AI Action Summit: Only 42% of biz leaders seeing an AI ROI [Kyndryl] (sponsor)
Number of The Week
71%
Reddit grew revenue by 71% in Q4 2024, and 62% for the year. But a miss un user numbers caused its stock to drop 5% on Thursday
Quote of The Week
Contrary to popular belief, it's probably the best time ever to be an engineer. The leverage you now have with AI is unbelievably crazy. And AI lets you subsume more and more of the roles that you used to rely on and wait around for. Golden age for engineering.
Box CEO Aaron Levie looking at the big picture in an X post this week.
This Week On Big Technology Podcast: AI Clones & The Future of Voice AI — With Evan Ratliff
Evan Ratliff is the host of Shell Game. Ratliff joins Big Technology Podcast to discuss how he cloned his voice with AI and sent it to interviews, social calls, and therapy. In this conversation, we learn about why he conducted the experiment and what it portends for the future of voice AI. Tune in for a lively discussion with plenty of fun anecdotes from when Ratliff send his AI voice clone out into the wild.
You can listen on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your podcast app of choice
Thanks again for reading. Please share Big Technology if you like it!
And hit that Like Button it’s almost as good as a $97 billion takeover bid for Big Technology.
My book Always Day One digs into the tech giants’ inner workings, focusing on automation and culture. I’d be thrilled if you’d give it a read. You can find it here.
Questions? News tips? Email me by responding to this email, or by writing alex@bigtechnology.com Or find me on Signal at 516-695-8680
Join us in the Big Technology Discord server Invite link for paid subscribers right below this line….