

Discover more from Big Technology
Facebook Removed The News Feed Algorithm In An Experiment. Then It Gave Up.
New leaked Facebook documents show what happened when Facebook tried to remove feed ranking. It didn't go well.
Big Technology is a weekly newsletter dedicated to covering the tech world with honest, nuanced reporting. Join the 10,000+ subscribers who tune into Big Technology for tech news without the spin. Here’s an easy way to subscribe:
Everyone seems to hate Facebook’s News Feed algorithm. Critics want to do away with it, and Congress may strip Facebook’s legal protections for the content it amplifies. Yet now, after years of speculation, we have an idea of what Facebook would look like without it.
In February 2018, a Facebook researcher all but shut off the News Feed ranking algorithm for .05% of Facebook users. “What happens if we delete ranked News Feed?” they asked in an internal report summing up the experiment. Their findings: Without a News Feed algorithm, engagement on Facebook drops significantly, people hide 50% more posts, content from Facebook Groups rises to the top, and — surprisingly — Facebook makes even more money from users scrolling through the News Feed.
The report comes from Frances Haugen’s disclosures to the Securities and Exchange Commission, which were also provided to Congress in redacted form by her legal team. The redacted versions received by Congress were obtained by a consortium of news organizations, including Big Technology. (Though I joined this consortium on Monday, I’m in favor of its dissolution and the speedy, responsible release of all Haugen’s documents to the public.)
Turning off the News Feed ranking algorithm, the researcher found, led to a worse experience almost across the board. People spent more time scrolling through the News Feed searching for interesting stuff, and saw more advertisements as they went (hence the revenue spike). They hid 50% more posts, indicating they weren’t thrilled with what they were seeing. They saw more Groups content, because Groups is one of the few places on Facebook that remains vibrant. And they saw double the amount of posts from public pages they don’t follow, often because friends commented on those pages. “We reduce the distribution of these posts massively as they seem to be a constant quality compliant,” the researcher said of the public pages.
The experiment was still in progress at the time of the report, but the researcher indicated that things were going poorly. “Things are trending down,” they said in an internal forum, adding a chart showing declining user sessions. Even though the researcher kept the “integrity pass” in place, or the first layer of the algorithm that sorts for integrity ahead of engagement, they said that “integrity bad metrics still shot through the roof.”
Meaningful Social Interactions — the back and forth comments between friends that Facebook optimizes for — also dropped by 20%. And given how angry some of these exchanges made people, that might not be a bad thing. But wiping out all ranked sorting of the News Feed clearly led to other problems, including the integrity issues. And bad actors, you can be sure, would find a way to exploit an algorithm-free Facebook.
Facebook eventually gave up on the idea — the News Feed is still ranked with an algorithm — but the experiment is revealing. It shows just how complex some of Facebook’s issues are, and that trying to solve them with soundbites often comes up short. These complex problems require nuanced answers, drawing from a deep understanding of the issues and attempted solutions. It’s a good thing we now have Facebook’s documents, via Haugen, to guide us.
Meet Big Technology’s Headline Sponsor: M1 Finance
There’s a classic Warren Buffett quote, “The only value of stock forecasters is to make fortune-tellers look good.”
With Wall Street Bets and Dogecoin and NFTs in the headlines, it’s increasingly important to identify and implement a long-term investing strategy as well — time in the market can work out better than timing the market.
That’s why M1 created the all-in-one Finance Super App that allows you to build a long-term portfolio of stocks and ETFs, borrow, and spend without any management fees.
Sign up today, and M1 will give you a $30 bonus when your account is approved and you deposit $1,000 within 14 days. Terms and conditions apply.
Investing in securities involves risks, including the risk of loss. M1 Finance LLC, Member FINRA/SIPC.
Okay, that’s it for today. See you on Thursday!
Facebook Removed The News Feed Algorithm In An Experiment. Then It Gave Up.
I've effectively had the "news feed algorithm" on Facebook off for years. They've made that harder to do, and it no longer "sticks", but without that choice I wouldn't use FB as much.
I have little idea what other people's experience is, but this conclusion, if applied to me, is bogus. How many others?
Another thing, I personally find hiding posts a natural part of reading Facebook. I see something, I read it, I often don't want to see it again. (Do you?) So one of their metrics is wrong, for me at least.
This is the thing with the metrics the "Growth Group" at Facebook uses and others use to "design" or is that misdesign the web. How much of their evaluation is based on bogus thinking? How much of the audience is harmed? To what degree?