“Ghosted.” Twitter’s Advertisers Pull Back Spending After Laid-Off Reps Disappear.
The narrative that post-layoff Twitter is doing fine isn’t totally right. The sales operation is struggling badly.
When Elon Musk trimmed Twitter’s 7,500-person workforce to 2,300, most tech executives took note. If Musk could keep the service running with one-third of the staff, they could probably trim generously as well. Quietly and not so quietly, these leaders spoke encouragingly of Twitter’s post-layoff performance. They even coined a term for the ousted employees: “Surplus Elites.”
But while Twitter’s service has held up well, its revenue operation is in crisis. Laid-off sales reps have disappeared on their advertisers — ”ghosted,” as one put it — leading many to pull spending or pause completely. In the fourth quarter, Twitter felt the drawback. Its revenue dropped 35% over the previous year. And given its current staffing levels, the company’s struggles appear likely to continue.
“Getting a Twitter rep to respond on advertising was always difficult,” said David Herrmann, a social media ad buyer. “But lately our emails have been falling into the abyss.”
Of the half dozen Twitter advertisers I interviewed for this story, nearly all experienced a meaningful decline in service after the company’s layoffs. “We had a couple of Twitter reps and they were like, ‘nothing’s changed,’” said one auto advertiser. “A few weeks later, there was another round of layoffs and they were gone.”
In place of standard communication from Twitter sales reps, advertisers have been sending emails into the void — including to laid-off employees’ inboxes — hoping someone will answer. Sometimes replies come, but often after long waits. The lack of responsiveness has left risk-averse advertisers feeling vulnerable, and some have decided it just isn’t worth it. “We’ve pulled out of Twitter for all our paid media,” said the advertiser. “It was never a big part of the spending plans but now it’s a zero part.”
Given that Twitter’s ad systems are largely automated, its sales reps play a crucial role in answering advertiser queries about ad delivery, bugs, and new products. This interaction is a fundamental reason why Twitter makes money, especially given its limited audience and technical capabilities. “You want to have that line of communication open,” said Eric Seufert, an investor whose companies advertise on Twitter.
Twitter’s ad reps also sell the company against Google and Facebook, a task that takes heavy lifting. The two tech giants have such finely honed systems that advertisers can comfortably spend knowing their dollars will turn into revenue, but this isn’t the case at Twitter. “At Google, you could not show up and the money would still fly through the vents,” said one ex-Twitter executive. “We had to come up with more creative ideas in order to earn our fair share or more.”
Advertisers are also sensitive to appearing next to ”unsafe” content, and Musk’s commitment to relax moderation standards has made many nervous. Typically, the company’s sales reps would smooth over these concerns. Facebook and YouTube have weathered countless content scandals that caused shortlived ad boycotts. But in Twitter’s case, the reps are not there and the brands remain wary.
Ultimately, Twitter may come out of this year okay. Musk may recognize his sales division’s struggles and work to rectify the issues. He’s already hired some laid-off employees back. And some forecasts, such as Insider Intelligence’s, still expect Twitter’s ad revenue to grow this year. But it will be a challenge. “Twitter's ad business has deteriorated even more rapidly than we expected,” said Jasmine Enberg, Insider Intelligence’s principal social media analyst. “We'll update our forecast again in March, and you can expect another downgrade to Twitter's ad revenues.”
Big Technology at SXSW
I’ll be heading to SXSW in Austin this year and am thinking about hosting a meetup of sorts. If you want to join, please share your email here. I’m also open to partnership and sponsorship opportunities. Feel free to share ideas in the form.
What Else I’m Reading
Esther Crawford, the ambitious Twitter exec with Elon’s ear, gets an FT profile [Financial Times]
In-depth on Lauren Sanchez, partner of Jeff Bezos [WSJ]
CNET’s AI-written articles were plagiarized after all [Futurism]
How AI might change media [Vanity Fair]
Robot lawyers threatened with jail time [NPR]
Salesforce lands an activist investor [WSJ]
Patreon plagued by mismanagement as ‘creator economy’ dream fades [The Information]
Why you shouldn’t speak with police like Alec Baldwin did [NYT]
A brutal report on trench warfare in Ukraine, which resembles WW1 [The Times]
Lifeguard wins “The Eddie,” a rare surfing competition in Hawaii named after fallen predecessor [New York Times]
Number Of The Week
Number of managers at Google, a reason why the company said it didn’t alert managers before layoffs.
Quote Of The Week
“Apple is fine with advertising, as long as they get to control it on their terms,”
Interactive Advertising Bureau CEO David Cohen in an effective war declaration against Apple, which the digital ad trade group is growing fed up with.
Advertise with Big Technology?
Advertising with Big Technology gets your product, service, or cause in front of the tech world’s top decision-makers. To reach 110,000+ plugged-in tech insiders, reply to this email or write alex dot kantrowitz at gmail dot com
This Week On Big Technology Podcast: Is ChatGPT A Step Toward Human-Level AI? — With Yann LeCun
Yann LeCun is the chief AI scientist at Meta, a professor of computer science at NYU, and a pioneer of deep learning. He joins Big Technology Podcast to put Generative AI in context, discussing whether ChatGPT and the like are a step toward human-level artificial intelligence, or something completely different. Join us for a fun, substantive discussion about this technology, the makeup of OpenAI, and where the field heads next. Stay tuned for the second half, where we discuss the ethics of using others' work to train AI models.
You can listen on Apple, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Thanks again for reading. Please share Big Technology if you like it! And hit that like button if you like news coverage that goes beyond the narrative.
Questions? Email me by responding to this email, or by writing firstname.lastname@example.org
News tips? Find me on Signal at 516-695-8680
I love the way that people pretend that Child Sexual Abuse images WEREN'T available on Twitter prior to Musk removing them.